Legal Opinion

Hills Dry Goods Co. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1935PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenbeRRY, C. J.

Sec. 102.60, Stats., provides:

“When the injury is sustained by a minor illegally employed, compensation and death benefits shall be as follows:
“(1) . . .
“(2) • • •
“(3) Treble the amount otherwise recoverable, if the injured employee is a minor of permit age, or over, and at the time of the injury is employed, required, suffered, or permitted to work at prohibited employment.”

Sec. 103.05 (3) provides:

“(3) Until such time as the industrial commission shall investigate, determine and fix the classifications provided for in paragraph (b) of subsection (2) of this section, the employments and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. International Harvester Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Kroger v. Cumberland Fruit Package Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  4. William Rahr Sons Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Oldenberg v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Stambaugh v. HayesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  2. R. T. Madden, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Princess House, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Marathon Electric Manufacturing Corp. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Motor Transport Co. v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API