Legal Opinion

Leisy v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 13, 1950No. 34,946PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Two actions, one by Herbert Leisy, the owner and operator of an automobile, to recover for personal injuries and property damage alleged to be the consequence of a collision with one of defendant railroad company’s trains negligently caused by defendants, and the other by Lelanie Leisy, a minor, by her father as natural guardian, to recover for personal injuries sustained by her as a consequence of the collision while she was a passenger in the automobile operated by her father, Herbert Leisy.

The question for decision is:

Whether, in determining whether a railroad was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Despatch Oven Co. v. RauenhorstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Licha v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. Ohrmann v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Lawson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Young v. WlazikSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Perkins v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Haukom v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. Cameron v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. Jorgenson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API