Legal Opinion

Jorgenson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 5, 1950No. Nos. 35,079, 35,080PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Justice.

The two cases above were consolidated for trial and likewise have been consolidated here. The appeals are from orders denying motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdicts or for a new trial after a verdict for plaintiff in each case.

The actions arose out of a collision between one of defendant’s freight trains and an automobile owned and driven by plaintiff *123Henry Jorgenson, in which his wife, plaintiff Olga Jorgenson, was riding. The collision occurred on May 7, 1948, at about 9:05 a. m. on a clear day. Defendant’s track at the place of the collision runs approximately…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hollister v. HinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  2. Lawson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Dahlquist v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Franklin v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  5. Massmann v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Young v. WlazikSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Yearout v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Haukom v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. Cameron v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  5. Jorgenson v. M. ST. P. & SSM RY. CO.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API