Legal Opinion

Licha v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 24, 1937No. 31,170PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Action for personal injuries in which the court granted defendants’ motion for judgment on the pleadings and plaintiff’s opening statement. Plaintiff moved for a new trial, which was denied, and appeals.

It appears that plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile driven by another, which ivas traveling in an easterly direction on Maryland street in the city of St. Paul at about 3:15 o’clock a. m. on the morning of December 35, 1935. There were six people in the car. The defendant’s tracks lie in a rather deep valley, into which Maryland street descends from an elevation on the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Wenger v. WengerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  4. Shaber v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  5. Crosby v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Olson v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Duxbury v. Spex Feeds, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  3. Cox v. Polson Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Dimond v. Terminal Railroad Assn.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  5. Munkel v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API