Legal Opinion

Karanian v. Maulucci

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 18, 1981PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmentano, J.

In order for this court judiciously and efficiently to consider claims of error raised on appeal, instructions for the preparation of an appellant’s brief are set out in Practice Book § 3060F. A similar set of instructions for the appellee’s brief are laid out in Practice Book § 3060U. In this appeal, the defendant has ignored each of the subsections of § 3060F. We also note that the plaintiff did not rebut the arguments made by the defendant in his appeal and that the defendant did not address the issues raised by the plaintiff in her cross appeal. This made it extremely difficult for this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jackson v. HooperSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
  2. Seitz v. MichelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  3. Burns v. GouldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  4. Carpenter v. WeichertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. Vogel v. Town of New MilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. New London Federal Savings Bank v. TucciaroneConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  2. Toledo Trust Co. v. Peoples Banking Co. (In Re Hartley)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1985
  3. Strobel v. StrobelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. Bartomeli v. BartomeliConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  5. D.S. Associates v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API