Legal Opinion
Burns v. Gould
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 11, 1977PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLoiselle, J.
The plaintiff, Donald W. Burns, and the defendant, Harry J. Could, developed a convalescent home in Newtown known as Buckingham Cardens, hereinafter Buckingham. They formed a corporation, and the plaintiff received 25 percent of its stock and an option to buy 24 percent more from the defendant for $12,000. In 1967, the defendant formed a second corporation, Bentley Cardens, Inc., hereinafter Bentley, to develop a nursing home in West Haven, but none of its stock was issued to the plaintiff. The plaintiff alleged that the parties had an oral agreement concerning the second corporation.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Grant v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Plumb v. CurtisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- M. J. Daly & Sons, Inc. v. New Haven Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
- Dick v. DickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Hewson v. Peterman Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Torosyan v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Seals v. HickeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Cohen v. CohenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Hall v. Horizon House Microwave, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.