Legal Opinion

Rhodus v. Ohio Department of Transportation

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 22, 1990No. 89AP-494PublishedCited by 416 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reilly, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant and cross-appellee, John Rhodus (“plaintiff”), appeals from a decision of the Court of Claims of Ohio rendering judgment in favor of defendant-appellee and cross-appellant, Ohio Department of Transportation (“defendant” or “ODOT”).

Plaintiff asserts four assignments of error:

“I. The trial court erred to the prejudice of appellant in holding that compliance with the minimum requirements of the Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices constitutes ordinary care as a matter of law.
“II. The trial court erred to the prejudice of appellant in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Knickel v. Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Reynolds v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Winwood v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Perkins v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by416 opinions

  1. Kniskern v. Township of SomerfordOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Feichtner v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Prstojevic v. Dept. of Transp., Dist. 3Ohio Court of Claims · 2010
  4. Young v. Univ. of Akron, 06ap-1022 (9-11-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Cunningham v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., 08ap-330 (12-30-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

411 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API