Legal Opinion
Rhodus v. Ohio Department of Transportation
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 22, 1990No. 89AP-494PublishedCited by 416 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Reilly, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant and cross-appellee, John Rhodus (“plaintiff”), appeals from a decision of the Court of Claims of Ohio rendering judgment in favor of defendant-appellee and cross-appellant, Ohio Department of Transportation (“defendant” or “ODOT”).
Plaintiff asserts four assignments of error:
“I. The trial court erred to the prejudice of appellant in holding that compliance with the minimum requirements of the Ohio Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices constitutes ordinary care as a matter of law.
“II. The trial court erred to the prejudice of appellant in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Knickel v. Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
- Reynolds v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Winwood v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Perkins v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by416 opinions
- Kniskern v. Township of SomerfordOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Feichtner v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Prstojevic v. Dept. of Transp., Dist. 3Ohio Court of Claims · 2010
- Young v. Univ. of Akron, 06ap-1022 (9-11-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Cunningham v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., 08ap-330 (12-30-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
411 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.