Legal Opinion

Knickel v. Department of Transportation

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 16, 1976No. 75AP-538PublishedCited by 430 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStrausbaugh, P. J.

This is an appeal by defendant

from a judgment in the Court of Claims in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $4,000.

The trial court sets forth the facts in part, in a carefully well-drawn opinion, as follows:

“This case came on for trial on the complaint and answer. The plaintiff claims that defendant was negligent in maintaining a designated area of U. R. [sic] Route 23 in Delaware County, Ohio, on July 11, 1974. As a result plaintiff claims damages for personal injury, property damage and expenses.
“Defendant admits the operative facts, denies negligence, additionally alleges lack of notice of…

2Cited by430 opinions

  1. Rhodus v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Kniskern v. Township of SomerfordOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Prstojevic v. Dept. of Transp., Dist. 3Ohio Court of Claims · 2010
  5. Cunningham v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., 08ap-330 (12-30-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

425 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API