Legal Opinion
Knickel v. Department of Transportation
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 16, 1976No. 75AP-538PublishedCited by 430 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStrausbaugh, P. J.
This is an appeal by defendant
from a judgment in the Court of Claims in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $4,000.
The trial court sets forth the facts in part, in a carefully well-drawn opinion, as follows:
“This case came on for trial on the complaint and answer. The plaintiff claims that defendant was negligent in maintaining a designated area of U. R. [sic] Route 23 in Delaware County, Ohio, on July 11, 1974. As a result plaintiff claims damages for personal injury, property damage and expenses.
“Defendant admits the operative facts, denies negligence, additionally alleges lack of notice of…
2Cited by430 opinions
- Rhodus v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Kniskern v. Township of SomerfordOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Prstojevic v. Dept. of Transp., Dist. 3Ohio Court of Claims · 2010
- Cunningham v. Ohio Dept. of Transp., 08ap-330 (12-30-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
425 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.