Legal Opinion

Society Natl. Bank v. Kienzle

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 1983No. 46112PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStillman, J.

Defendant credit cardholder appeals from a municipal court judgment in favor of plaintiff credit card issuer for alleged authorized transactions involving defendant’s credit card. Defendant urges error in the trial court’s: (1) refusal to dismiss the case for want of prosecution; (2) hearing of the action without subject matter jurisdiction; and (3) rendering defendant liable for money damages in excess of a federally imposed maximum. Since we agree with defendant’s assertion that he could be liable only for the maximum imposed by the federal statute, we modify the trial court’s judgment…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. Martin v. Hunter's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
  4. Testa v. KattSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Claflin v. HousemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baker v. ConlanOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Deutsche Bank Trust Company v. McCafferty, 1-07-26 (2-11-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Owens v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Universal Bank v. McCaffertyOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Rapp v. Nationwide Mutual Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API