Legal Opinion

Testa v. Katt

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 10, 1947No. 431PublishedCited by 472 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black

Section 205 (e) 1 of the Emergency Price Control Act provides that a buyer of goods at above the prescribed ceiling price may sue the seller “in any court of competent jurisdiction” for not more than three times the amount of the overcharge plus costs and a reasonable attorney’s fee. Section 205 (c) 2 provides that federal district courts shall have jurisdiction of such suits “concurrently with State and Territorial courts.” Such a suit under § 205 (e) must be brought “in the district or county in which the defendant resides or has a place of business . . . .”

The respondent was in the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Martin v. Hunter's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
  2. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Ex Parte SieboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Claflin v. HousemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by472 opinions

  1. Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Martinez v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

467 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API