Legal Opinion
Stoeger v. Burlington Northern Railroad
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 18, 1996No. CC 9304-02196; CA A82933; SC S42068PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
Plaintiff, an employee of defendant Burlington Northern Railroad Company (BN), brought this action alleging that he was injured while working on sidetracks owned by defendant Elf Atochem North America, Inc. (Atochem). The trial court granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment on the ground that there was no genuine issue of material fact regarding defendants’ alleged negligence. The Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion. Stoeger v. Burlington Northern Railroad Co., 132 Or App 552, 889 P2d 391 (1995). For the reasons stated below, we reverse.
On review of a summary judgment, this…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Welch v. Bancorp Management Advisors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Jones v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Welch v. Bancorp Management Advisors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Henderson-Rubio v. May Department Stores Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Schram v. Albertson's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- Davis v. County of ClackamasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Lyons v. Walsh & Sons Trucking Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Knepper v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Kennedy v. Eden Advanced Pest TechnologiesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.