Legal Opinion
Lackmann v. Kearney
California Supreme Court
Decided February 4, 1904No. S.F. No. 2823PublishedCited by 9 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, C.
The plaintiff is the sheriff of the ffity and county of San Francisco; and this suit was brought, under section 386 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to compel the defendants to interplead as to their several claims to moneys collected by him under execution on a judgment of date November 12,1900, in favor of the last-named defendant against one Atwater. The execution was levied under instructions of plaintiff therein, the Tayler & Spotswood Company, upon certain accounts due to Atwater from various persons, and the sum of $162.95 was collected. Afterwards, on December 26, 1900, while…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
- Wheelock v. . LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- McCormick v. Orient InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Barnhart v. FulkerthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Montgomery v. Sping Valley Mining & Irrigating Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by9 opinions
- Henry v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Stern v. Sunset Road Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Houghton v. Pacific Southwest Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Frank v. Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Gordon v. HutchinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.