Legal Opinion

Giacomini v. Pacific Lumber Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1907No. Civ. No. 252PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County, and from an order denying a new trial. G. W. Hunter, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

A jury awarded respondent the sum of $3,500 as damages for injuries received in a shingle-mill belonging to appellant. The appeal is from the judgment and order denying the motion for a new trial.

The complaint alleges that “on the twelfth day of December, 1900, and for some time prior thereto, said plaintiff was employed by defendant in the capacity of shingle sawyer at one of said machines (a hand-shingle machine) so known and designated as machine No. 3, with instructions to attend to the setting of the screws of said other hand-shingle machines when the same were being operated by…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Casement v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Callan v. BullCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Dyas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Donnelly v. San Francisco Bridge Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Linnehan v. RollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barton v. Studebaker Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. ScruggsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Tucker v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Majors v. ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Fechtner v. CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API