Legal Opinion

Majors v. Connor

California Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1912No. L.A. No. 2725PublishedCited by 20 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order refusing a new trial. Walter Bor dwell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Plaintiff was injured by the falling of a brick wall in course of construction, upon which he was working at the time as a mason. The wall in question was a part of an addition to the Hotel Melrose in Los Angeles, and its fall was due to the collapse of faultily constructed piers on the north half of said addition. The Connor & Perry Investment Company was sued as the contractor, and defendant Connor as manager of said company. A verdict in favor of Majors, the plaintiff, for twelve hundred and fifty dollars was returned by the jury, and judgment was entered accordingly. From said judgment…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kaltschmidt v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Hanley v. California Bridge & Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Robinson v. Exempt Fire Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Silveira v. IversenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Nathan v. DierssenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  2. May v. FarrellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Collins v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Curcic v. Nelson Display Co.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Devens v. GoldbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API