Legal Opinion

Papiernick v. City of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreenberg, J.

Taxpayers of this city, on three separate occasions during the two weeks ’ period while this court was assigned to Special Term for motions and trials, have leveled assaults, based, to be sure, on constitutional grounds, but fundamentally predicated, upon the taxing legerdermain employed by the city in its desperate attempt to meet its fiscal problems. First there was the attack upon the liquor license tax, then the challenge to a phase of the financial institutions tax, and now this broadside against the automobile use tax presently before the court for disposition. And immediately there is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sprout v. South BendSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Maxwell v. BugbeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Interstate Busses Corp. v. BlodgettSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. East End Trust Co. v. OttenNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Robia Holding Corp. v. WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Town of Hempstead ex rel. Town of Hempstead Park DistrictNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Woodley v. ButlerNew York Supreme Court · 1979
  3. NYCTL 1998-1 v. MayfieldNew York Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API