In re the Town of Hempstead ex rel. Town of Hempstead Park District
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHoward T. Hogan, J.
Proceedings in eminent domain have been instituted by the Town of Hempstead and the County of Nassau.
The claimant has served a notice to examine the “ Town of Hempstead, by its engineer having knowledge of the facts and who will testify for the Town of Hempstead on said issue at the trial ” and to testify “ more specifically as to all the facts and circumstances relied upon, reviewed and contained in his appraisal of engineering costs necessary to be incurred in the development of claimant’s damage parcel so as to make same available for residential use in the future,” and calls for the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Leet v. . KellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- East End Trust Co. v. OttenNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Robia Holding Corp. v. WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Strauch v. Town of Oyster BayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- People Ex Rel. Savory, Inc. v. PlunkettNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Woodley v. ButlerNew York Supreme Court · 1979
- In re the Incorporated Village of HempsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1968
- In re the Town of HempsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1968
- NYCTL 1998-1 v. MayfieldNew York Supreme Court · 2007
- Willmott v. DysonNew York Supreme Court · 1984