Legal Opinion
East End Trust Co. v. Otten
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 6, 1931PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cardozo, Ch. J.
Submission of a controversy upon agreed facts under Civil Practice Act, section 546.
By a decree of the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin county, Pennsylvania, plaintiff, a trust company incorporated under the laws of that State, was appointed committee of the property of Minnie Smith, an incompetent.
By an order of the Supreme Court of New York, the trust company was appointed ancillary committee of the property of the incompetent located in this State. Simultaneously with its appointment, the committee submitted a petition for leave to sell and convey an undivided interest in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of Murray Hill BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- In re NeallyNew York Supreme Court · 1864
- In re PerkinsNew York Court of Chancery · 1816
- In re PaynNew York Supreme Court · 1852
3Cited by24 opinions
- Carr v. New York State Board of ElectionsNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Dutchess County Department of Social Services v. DayNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Gwynne v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 3New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- MATTER OF BUSH v. SalernoNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Erie County Water Authority v. KramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.