Legal Opinion
Sprout v. South Bend
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 14, 1928No. 208PublishedCited by 217 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
277 U.S. 163 (1928)
SPROUT
v.
CITY OF SOUTH BEND.
No. 208.
Supreme Court of United States.
Submitted January 20, 1928.
Decided May 14, 1928.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA.
Mr. Dudley M. Shively, with whom Messrs. Isaac K. Parks, Frank Gilmer, and Walter R. Arnold were on the brief, submitted for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Iden S. Romig, City Attorney, submitted for defendant in error.
2Opinion of the Court · BrandeisJustice Brandeis
By ordinance adopted in 1921, South Bend, Indiana, prohibited, with exceptions not here material, the operation on its streets of any motor bus for hire unless licensed by the city. Sprout, a resident of that State,…
3Cases cited43 opinions
- Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Hendrick v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Kane v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Crutcher v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Buck v. KuykendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by217 opinions
- Sproles v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Miller Brothers Co. v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
212 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.