Legal Opinion
Pearce v. Freeman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 22, 1927No. 15324PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHefner, J.
Pearce sued Freeman for specific performance of a contract of sale of certain rea,! estate. Freeman elaim'ed a breach of the contract in that Pearce had failed to comply with the following clause;
“It is understood by and between the parties hereto that the party of the first part is to furnish a good and merchantable title to the said property. That if the first party has an abstract to this certain property, he is to furnish it; otherwise the abstract is to be furnished and paid for by the second party.”
The abstract furnished disclosed that the lands were allotted to Jennie Tannitubi; that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Turner v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Campbell v. HarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Gwin v. CalegarisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- McCleary v. ChipmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hanlon v. McLainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
- Jennings v. New York Petroleum Royalty Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Hawkins v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Tull v. MilliganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Freeman v. PearceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.