Legal Opinion

Pearce v. Freeman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 22, 1927No. 15324PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHefner, J.

Pearce sued Freeman for specific performance of a contract of sale of certain rea,! estate. Freeman elaim'ed a breach of the contract in that Pearce had failed to comply with the following clause;

“It is understood by and between the parties hereto that the party of the first part is to furnish a good and merchantable title to the said property. That if the first party has an abstract to this certain property, he is to furnish it; otherwise the abstract is to be furnished and paid for by the second party.”

The abstract furnished disclosed that the lands were allotted to Jennie Tannitubi; that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Turner v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Campbell v. HarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Gwin v. CalegarisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. McCleary v. ChipmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hanlon v. McLainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  2. Jennings v. New York Petroleum Royalty Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  3. Hawkins v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  4. Tull v. MilliganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Freeman v. PearceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API