Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Pearce

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 28, 1928No. 18959PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was begun in the district court of Garvin county by the defendant in error herein, as plaintiff, to recover the balance due upon a contract wherein he sold to the defendant, Freeman, an oil and gas lease together with the one-half royalty interest in the mineral and oil rights on, in, and to certain lands described in the contract. To the plaintiff’s petition the defendant filed his answer and cross-petition, wherein he relied upon the contract, but denied good and merchantable title in the plaintiff, and alleged a breach of said contract upon the part of the plaintiff by reason…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Herbert v. WaggSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Hardy, District JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Citizens Bank of Millerton v. BeesonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Armstrong v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. First Trust & Savings Bank of Chicago v. BloodworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Howell v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Blackwell Oil & Gas Co. v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Liberty Glass Co. v. BartlettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API