Legal Opinion

R. H. Herron Co. v. Shaw

California Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1913No. L.A. No. 2983PublishedCited by 23 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Charles Monroe, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an action against the several defendants, as stockholders of a corporation named Kern River Mining and Power Company to recover a separate judgment against each of them in a sum' equal to the amount unpaid upon his subscription for the stock of said company held by him, not exceeding, however, the debt which it is alleged is due from said company to the plaintiff. The court below made its findings and thereupon rendered judgment for the defendants, from which plaintiff appeals.

The complaint is in three counts. Each count is based upon a judgment recovered by plaintiff against said…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Van Cleve v. BerkeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  2. Elyton Land Co. v. Birmingham Warehouse & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Vermont Marble Co. v. Declez Granite Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Douglass v. . IrelandNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Young v. Erie Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Moore v. MoffattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Spencer v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Rhode v. Dock-Hop Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Kaye v. MetzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Harrison v. ArmourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API