Harrison v. Armour
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. James P. Clark, C. A. Post, and H. S. Clewett, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.
This is an action by a judgment creditor of a corporation, to subject to the payment of his claim the unpaid subscriptions of various stockholders.
The complaint alleged the incorporation, in June, 1907, of Marine Power and Electric Company, the recovery by the plaintiff on July 7, 1911, of a judgment against said corporation for $1,127.35 and costs, the return of the execution unsatisfied and the nonpayment of the judgment. It alleged further that the capital stock of the corporation was divided into shares of the par value of one dollar each and that the various defendants had subscribed for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Vermont Marble Co. v. Declez Granite Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
- R. H. Herron Co. v. ShawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Johnson v. LullmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1884
3Cited by12 opinions
- Moore v. MoffattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Spencer v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Rhode v. Dock-Hop Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Kaye v. MetzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- J. F. Lucey Co. v. McMullenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.