Kaye v. Metz
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Black & Black, D. S. Hammack, Alfred L. Black, E. W. Owen, C. L. Claflin, Anderson & Borton and Hammack & Black for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an action by W. W. Kaye, as trustee in bankruptcy of the J. M. S. Oil Company, a bankrupt corporation, against alleged stockholders of said corporation to recover of eadh the balance alleged to be unpaid to the corporation for the stock thereof belonging to Mm. The court found in favor of the plaintiff and gave judgment accordingly. The appeal is from the judgment. We take up the points presented in the order in wMch they appear in the appellants’ brief.
[1] 1. The appellants contend' that the action is barred by section 339 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the two years’ statute of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Scovill v. ThayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Sanger v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Sawyer v. HoagSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Scammon v. KimballSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Baines v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Harrison v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Garrison v. Edward Brown & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Prudential Reinsurance Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Geary Street, Park & Ocean Railroad v. RolphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Advance Industrial Finance Co. v. Western Equities, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.