Legal Opinion

Young v. Erie Iron Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1887PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Appeal from Marquette. (Grant, J.) Bill filed for the appointment of a receiver for an insolvent •corporation, and for other relief. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The complainant filed the bill of complaint in •this suit in behalf of himself and such other creditors of the Erie Iron Company as should come in and prove their claims against said defendant corporation, and share the expense of the proceedings, against the said Erie Iron Company, a corporation organized under Act No. 113 of the Session Laws *112of 1877, and the acts amendatory thereof, and certain of the-stockholders of the said company, naming them. The complainant endeavored to make all the stockholders who were-responsible and residents of the State defendants. He also made defendants those…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sanger v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Robinson v. BidwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Goodrich v. Reynolds, Wilder & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Turnbull v. Prentiss Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Phelan v. HazardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1878

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Feehan v. KendrickIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  2. R. H. Herron Co. v. ShawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Young v. FarwellIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  4. McBryan v. Universal Elevator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Rickerson Roller-Mill Co. v. Farrell Foundry & Machine Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API