Beswick v. Dorris
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California
In Equity. Suit by Richard Beswick against W. J. Dorris and P. S. Dorris. On demurrer to amended bill.
1Opinion of the Court
VAN EEEET, District Judge.
The amended bill in this ease is defective in certain respects which require that the demurrer thereto be sustained, and its defects may be briefly pointed out.
1. In the first place, the bill is wanting iu substantive facts to warrant the interference of a court of equity. It seeks to have set aside a. conveyance to the defendants of certain real estate upon the ground that it was made in fraud of the rights of complainant as a creditor of the defendants’ grantors. The transaction counted upon is, in substance, as alleged, that Presley A. Dorris and Carlos J. Dorris,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Byers v. McAuleySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Badger v. BadgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Jones v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Kleinclaus v. DutardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Bell v. HudsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Vadner v. VadnerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1918
- Rummens v. Guaranty Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1939
- Webb v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Houghton v. Pacific Southwest Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- American Surety Co. v. ConwayDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1915
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.