Legal Opinion

Rummens v. Guaranty Trust Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1939No. 27275. En BancPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Plaintiffs brought suit, in the nature of a creditors’ bill in equity, to set aside an alleged gift and transfer of property by a debtor, now deceased, to a third party whose estate is, by reason of his death, being administered by his legal representative. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and, plaintiffs having elected to stand on their pleading, the court entered an order dismissing the action. Plaintiffs have appealed.

This action grows out of a complex situation resulting from the financial relations formerly existing between Sarah E. Smith and Reese B. Brown, and from certain…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Putney v. FletcherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  2. Herrlich v. KaufmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Smith v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Buchanan v. BuchananSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  5. Fourth National Bank v. MeadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Chandler v. WelbornTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Peoples National Bank v. OstranderCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  3. TMT Bear Creek Shopping Center, Inc. v. Petco Animal Supplies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. Motoda v. DonohoeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  5. Stephanus v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API