Habenicht v. Lissak
California Supreme Court
Appeal from ati order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, in proceedings supplementary to execution, appointing a receiver, with power to sell, and directing assignments-to him of seats in a stock exchange and a produce exchange owned by the debtor. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
In March, 1884, the plaintiff recovered judgment against defendant for several thousand dollars. About a year later, a writ of execution was issued on the judgment, and placed in the hands of the sheriff, by whom it was afterward returned wholly unsatisfied. In June, 1885, the proceedings to be reviewed herein—proceedings supplementary to execution—were instituted by the plaintiff upon the unsatisfied judgment in his favor. Upon the examination of the judgment debtor, it was disclosed that he owned a seat or membership in the San Francisco Stock and Exchange Board, and another seat or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hyde v. WoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Hadden v. SpaderCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1822
- Powell v. . WaldronNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Pacific Bank v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Stoors v. KelseyNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Bruton v. TearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Herrlich v. KaufmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Phillips v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Wagner v. Farmers Co-operative Exchange Co. of Good ThunderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- McCutcheon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.