Herrlich v. Kaufmann
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
John McKenzie was a stock broker, and on December 3, 1886, made an assignment for the benefit of his creditors to the defendant, C. IT. Kaufmann, pursuant to the provisions of the Civil Code on the subject. Prior and down to the assignment McKenzie had been doing a stock business with one Margaret McDonald, and owed her, or some one for whom *273she was acting, several thousand dollars. Julie Herrlich, the plaintiff in the case at bar, recovered a judgment (the date of which is in dispute) against said McDonald for $6,210.86; and on December 31, 1886, she had an execution issued upon said…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Adams v. HackettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1857
- Pacific Bank v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Hexter v. CliffordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1879
- Roberts & Co. v. LandeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Mesmer v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Wulfjen v. DoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Travis Glass Co. v. IbbetsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Lewis v. ChamberlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Bond v. BulgheroniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Marshall v. WentzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.