Legal Opinion

Evanston Insurance v. OEA, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 21, 2009No. 07-15316PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUG, Circuit Judge:

OEA, Inc. (“OEA”) appeals the final judgment incorporating the district court’s orders of September 22, 2003 and March 30, 2004 granting summary judgment for Evanston Insurance Company (“Evans-ton”) and Royal Insurance Company of America (“Royal”) and awarding prejudgment interest to Evanston. 1 The insur anee policies at issue are general commercial liability policies, with the Royal policy providing excess coverage above the Evanston policy. In granting summary judgment, the district court determined that Evanston and Royal were not obligated to defend and indemnify OEA…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Balint v. Carson CityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Dannenberg v. PaineWebber Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Levy-Zentner Co. v. SOUTHERN PAC. TRANSPORTATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Arakaki v. HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Philip K. Paulson v. City of San Diego Mt. Soledad Memorial Association, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Van Asdale v. International Game TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Love v. Associated Newspapers, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Jadwin v. County of KernDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
  4. Jon Frudden v. Kayann PillingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. Baccei v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API