Legal Opinion
Jon Frudden v. Kayann Pilling
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 11, 2017No. 15-15448PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
In July 2011, Mary and Jon Frudden brought suit against officials and entities associated with the Roy Gomm Elementary School (“RGES”) and the Washoe County School District (“WCSD”) in Nevada. The Fruddens challenged on First Amendment grounds a school uniform policy that required their two minor children to wear shirts or sweatshirts with a logo consisting of the name of the school, a stylized picture of a gopher (the school mascot), and the motto “Tomorrow’s Leaders.” An exemption from the policy allowed students to wear the uniform of a nationally…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Ashcroft v. al-KiddSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Elizabeth Cornel v. State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Tan Lam v. City of Los BanosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Gaylan Harris v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Earth Island Institute v. UsfsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
- Cesar Martinez-Rodriguez v. Curtis GilesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.