Legal Opinion
Dannenberg v. PaineWebber Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 19, 1994No. 94-16150PublishedCited by 170 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Opinion filed October 19, 1994 [38 F.3d 1078] is amended as follows: At page 12816 [1091], second full paragraph, delete the second and third sentences and replace with the following:
Only four of Toolworks’s actual OEM contracts, however, contained such language. Because only a small portion of the total OEM contracts included the “model” language, Deloitte should have known that the model agreement was false and misleading, and inclusion of the model agreement in the July 1 SEC letter gives rise to a reasonable inference that Deloitte knew or recklessly disregarded this falsehood.
The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- In Re Apple Computer Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by170 opinions
- Cooper v. PickettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Glassman v. Computervision Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,266 Irene L. Wright, on Behalf of Herself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Ernst & Young LLPCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Gorman v. Wolpoff & Abramson, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Joan C. Howard v. Everex Systems, Inc., Steven L.W. Hui Michael C.Y. Wong Wong's International (Holdings) Limited Gatcombe Corp. N.V.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.