Legal Opinion
Van Asdale v. International Game Technology
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 13, 2009No. 07-16597PublishedCited by 246 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BYBEE, Circuit Judge:
This case presents our first opportunity to examine the substantive requirements necessary to establish a claim under the whistleblower-protection provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1514A. Plaintiffs Shawn and Lena Van Asdale appeal from the district court’s summary judgment in favor of their former employer, International Game Technology (“IGT”), on their claim of retaliatory discharge in violation of § 1514A, as well as the district court’s dismissal of their factually-related Nevada state-law claims. We conclude that the Van Asdales raised a genuine…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Reloynne K. Villiarimo Joseph Harvest v. Aloha Island Air, Inc., Dba Island Air Rosie Nenezich Richard HeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Cleveland v. Policy Management Systems Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Andrew G. YARTZOFF, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lee M. THOMAS, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by246 opinions
- Nevada v. Bank of America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Nielsen v. AECOM Technology Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- George Mitchell v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Theodore Heinemann, I v. Daniel SatterbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Charles Yeager v. Connie BowlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
241 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.