Legal Opinion
Candito v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (City of Philadelphia)
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 31, 2001PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
- Judge PELLEGRINI.
Domenic Candito (Claimant) appeals from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the Workers’ Compensation Judge’s (WCJ) decision denying his penalty petition for the City of Philadelphia’s (Employer) failure to pay a workers’ compensation award within 30 days because it had timely filed for a request for supersedeas that was ultimately granted.
On February 18, 1994, Claimant filed a claim petition for specific loss benefits for injuries he sustained while working for Employer as an Abandoned Auto Officer for the City of Philadelphia Police…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Republic Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. RucciSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Cunningham v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Esssroc Materials v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Crucible, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Vinovich)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Snizaski v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Budd Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- United States Steel Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Hoover v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.