Hoover v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY Senior
Judge McCloskey.
Harry Hoover (Claimant) petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board), affirming in part and reversing in part the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ), granting Claimant’s petition for penalties but refusing to award Claimant attorney fees for an unreasonable contest. 1 We now reverse.
Employer employed Claimant as a union truck driver. Claimant originally sustained injuries to his legs and lower back in the course and scope of his employment with Employer on September 11, 1993, while attempting to disconnect…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Leon E. Wintermyer, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Cunningham v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Candito v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (City of Philadelphia)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Crucible, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (Vinovich)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Pruitt v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Snizaski v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Bates v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Snizaski v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Varkey v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Gibson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.