Legal Opinion

Budd Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 16, 2004PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

judge SIMPSON.

Before the Court are the most recent 1 appeals of Tong Kan (Claimant) and the Budd Company (Employer) in complex, acrimonious litigation under the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act). 2 At issue are three Board orders covering matters at five different docket numbers. Lamenting the flight of common sense from this litigation, we wade into the swamp.

I. Background

A. Facts

The tortured history of this litigation requires explanation. Claimant worked for Employer as a tool and dye maker. Claimant sustained a work-related lower back injury in mid-May 1992 (1992 injury), and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Leon E. Wintermyer, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. McCloskey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Vista International Hotel v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Daniels)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. McKay v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Westmoreland County v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Levy v. Senate of PennsylvaniaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Chambersburg Area School District v. M. DorseyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. In Re Establishment of Independent School District Consisting of the Borough of WheatlandCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API