State v. Martinez
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THOMPSON, Judge.
¶ 1 In this opinion we address issues presented by the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Blakely v. Washington, — U.S. —, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). We hold that a judge’s imposition of an aggravated sentence that falls within the range authorized by a jury’s verdict comports with Blakely; a jury need not find every aggravator upon which a sentencing judge relies. Further, we hold that Blakely error is subject to harmless error or fundamental error analysis and may or may not require reversal based on the facts of a particular case. Here,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- State v. RingArizona Supreme Court · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. MartinezArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- State v. TimmonsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- State v. OaksCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- State v. BurdickCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.