Legal Opinion

State v. Martinez

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 4, 2004No. 1 CA-CR 03-0728PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

THOMPSON, Judge.

¶ 1 In this opinion we address issues presented by the United States Supreme Court’s recent decision in Blakely v. Washington, — U.S. —, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). We hold that a judge’s imposition of an aggravated sentence that falls within the range authorized by a jury’s verdict comports with Blakely; a jury need not find every aggravator upon which a sentencing judge relies. Further, we hold that Blakely error is subject to harmless error or fundamental error analysis and may or may not require reversal based on the facts of a particular case. Here,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. State v. RingArizona Supreme Court · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. MartinezArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  3. State v. TimmonsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  4. State v. OaksCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  5. State v. BurdickCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API