Legal Opinion
State v. Ring
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided April 3, 2003No. CR-97-0428-AP, CR-99-0536-AP, CR-99-0439-AP, CR-00-0328-AP, CR-00-0360-AP, CR-00-0447-AP, CR-01-0275-AP, CR-00-0508-AP, CR-00-0544-AP, CR-00-0595-AP, CR-01-0091-AP, CR-01-0100-AP, CR-01-0103-AP, CR-01-0129-AP, CR-01-0270-AP, CR-01-0421-AP, CR-02-0042-AP, CR-02-0044-AP, CR-99-0296-AP, CR-99-0551-AP, CR-99-0438-AP, CR-98-0289-AP, CR-98-0376-AP, CR-97-0317-AP, CR-98-0488-AP, CR-97-0349-AP, CR-98-0278-APPublishedCited by 298 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MeGREGOR, Vice Chief Justice.
¶ 1 This case comes to us on remand from the United States Supreme Court, Ring v. Arizona, 586 U.S. 584, 608-609, 122 S.Ct. 2428, 2443, 153 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002) (Ring II). We have jurisdiction pursuant to the Arizona Constitution, Article VI, Section 5.3.
I
Facts and Procedural History.
¶ 2 On December 6, 1996, a jury convicted Timothy Stuart Ring of first degree murder, conspiracy to commit armed robbery, armed robbery, burglary and theft. Under Arizona law at the time of Ring’s sentencing, capital sentencing followed the procedure set forth at Arizona Revised…
2Cases cited114 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by298 opinions
- State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- Timothy Lee Hurst v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
- State v. MoodyArizona Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. EllisonArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. AndersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
293 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.