State v. Martinez
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McGREGOR, Chief Justice.
¶ 1 We granted review in this case to resolve a single issue: Does the Sixth Amendment guarantee of a right to jury trial, as applied to Arizona’s general felony sentencing scheme, require that a sentencing judge consider only those aggravating factors found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt in determining whether to impose an aggravated sentence, or may the judge find and consider additional aggravating factors once a single aggravating factor has been found by the jury, is inherent in the jury’s verdict,-or has been admitted by the defendant? We exercise…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. GlasselArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. SwoopesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- State v. HamptonArizona Supreme Court · 2006
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.