Legal Opinion

State v. Martinez

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 2005No. CR-04-0435-PRPublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McGREGOR, Chief Justice.

¶ 1 We granted review in this case to resolve a single issue: Does the Sixth Amendment guarantee of a right to jury trial, as applied to Arizona’s general felony sentencing scheme, require that a sentencing judge consider only those aggravating factors found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt in determining whether to impose an aggravated sentence, or may the judge find and consider additional aggravating factors once a single aggravating factor has been found by the jury, is inherent in the jury’s verdict,-or has been admitted by the defendant? We exercise…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. GlasselArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. SwoopesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. State v. HamptonArizona Supreme Court · 2006

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API