Preveslin v. Derby & Ansonia Developing Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
We think the subordinate facts fully support the conclusions reached by the commissioner: The defendant was the principal employer in the erection of certain houses and as such procured through its agent Ratner certain work to be done in the construction of these houses which was a part or process in the trade or business of this employer and the defendant at all times retained the premises under its control. The plaintiff-claimant while at work on one of these houses sustained a personal injury arising out of and in the course- of his employment. His in jury arose, the commissioner held,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871
- Powers v. Hotel Bond Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Travelers Insurance v. OhlerNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
- Gauthier's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1921
- Atwood v. BuckinghamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1905
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Manchester Environmental Coalition v. StocktonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Caldor, Inc. v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Sheff v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Hillier v. City of East HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Price v. All American Engineering CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.