Legal Opinion

Civardi v. City of Norwich

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 8, 1994No. 14982PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKatz, J.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the named defendant, the city of Norwich, by properly transferring its obligation to pay for the “compensation and medical treatment” of its injured employee, the plaintiff, Robert Civardi, to the defendant second injury fund (fund) under General Statutes (Rev. to 1983) § 31-349,1 thereby also transferred its responsibility *289under General Statutes (Rev. to 1983) § 31-284b,2 to pay for Civardi’s insurance benefits. In its appeal from *290the decision of the workers’ compensation review board denying its request to transfer to the fund its obligations under §…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. Greater Washington Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Lauer v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. State v. OuelletteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. Crochiere v. Board of Education of Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  5. Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. v. IlsleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  2. Hall v. Gilbert & Bennett Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Davis v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  4. Luce v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  5. Rana v. RitaccoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API