Legal Opinion
Coley v. Camden Associates, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 25, 1997No. SC 15738PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CALLAHAN, C. J.
This is an appeal by the defendant second injury fund (fund) from a decision of the workers’ compensation review board (board) that Public Acts 1995, No. 95-277, § 9 (f) (P.A. 95-277, § 9 [f]), now codified at General Statutes § 31-301 (f),1 applies prospectively only. The board determined that the fund, *313rather than the claimant’s employer or the employer’s insurer, was liable for the payment of workers’ compensation benefits to the claimant during the pendency of a previous appeal. The previous appeal was brought by the claimant’s employer and the employer’s insurer…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Frillici v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. MagnanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Darak v. DarakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Hall v. Gilbert & Bennett Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Hatt v. Burlington Coat FactorySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Sullivan AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Ferrigno v. Cromwell Development AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Linden Condominium Ass'n v. McKennaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.