Legal Opinion

Long v. John Breuner Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1918No. Civ. No. 1783PublishedCited by 40 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and from an order denying a new trial. Peter J. Shields, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

A jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff in the sum of four thousand five hundred dollars as damages sustained by her on account of injuries caused by her slipping and falling upon an incline in front of the main entrance to the store of the defendant in Sacramento. Judgment was entered for that amount, from which and from the order denying its motion for a new trial defendant appeals.

The defendant conducts a furniture store on the south side of K Street between Sixth and Seventh Streets, in said city of Sacramento. At the time of the accident to plaintiff there was a concrete incline…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. District of Columbia v. ArmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. City of Chicago v. PowersIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Wahlgreen v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Kimic v. San Jose-Los Gatos Interurban Ry.California Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Dyas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1903

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Neel v. Mannings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Hicks v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Gorman v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. McCormick v. Great Western Power Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
  5. McStay v. Citizens National Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API