Bradbury Estate Co. v. Carroll
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
LANDIS, J., pro tem.
In form, this is an action to quiet title.
Plaintiff alleged ownership to two parcels of land, parcel 1 consisting of 93.84 acres and parcel 2 consisting of 69.57 acres, both being portions of the Rancho Azusa de Duarte in Los Angeles County, California, and following the usual allegations that defendants assert an interest adverse to plaintiff and that such claim is without right, plaintiff further alleges that while it was the absolute owner and entitled to possession, defendants Carroll, without right, title or license from plaintiff entered into possession, fenced and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ryder v. BambergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Bemmerly v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. Sing YowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. OxnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- City and County of San Francisco v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kauffman v. De MutiisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Baker v. BerremanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- MacKenzie v. AngleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Laverne v. DoldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Griffeth v. FehselCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.