Legal Opinion

R. J. Saunders & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided March 14, 1958No. 4916PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRich, Judge

This appeal is from a judgment of the Customs Court, First Division, C. D. 1846, overruling appellant’s protest without affirming the action of the collector.

The imported merchandise consists of a complete electron microscope in a knocked-down or unassembled condition. It was classified by the collector under the eo nomine provision for microscopes in paragraph 228 (b), Tariff Act of 1930, and assessed with duty at 45 per centum ad valorem. The importer claims the merchandise is properly dutiable at 15 per centum ad valorem under the first or third provisions of paragraph 353, as modified by…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. R. J. Saunders & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  2. R. J. Saunders & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Deckers Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  2. Container Store v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2016
  3. Frank P. Dow Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API