Legal Opinion

State v. Sorrentino

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 1921No. 1181PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bdume, Justice.

A petition for rehearing was filed herein by defendant on various grounds. The right for an oral argument having been asked, and the court desiring to be more fully advised, it was granted. After due consideration, we are still of the opinion that as to whether or not the defendant was guilty of manslaughter was, under the facts of this case, a question for the jury. We do not think that such holding is in any way inconsistent with the holding of this court in Palmer v. State, 9 Wyo. 40; 59 Pac. 793, 87 Am. St. Rep. 910; nor do we think, as argued, that by our holding every man…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fritz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. State v. RamirezIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State v. O'DonnellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  4. Port v. ParfitWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  5. State v. FreidrichWashington Supreme Court · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. KefferWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Jahnke v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. MalufauHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Armstrong v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Nunez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API