Legal Opinion

State v. O'Donnell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 13, 1916PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Appeal from Lee District Gowrt. — W. S. Hamilton, Judge. A jury found the defendant guilty of murder in the first degree, and directed that capital punishment be inflicted. Sentence passed accordingly,, and defendant appeals.—

1Opinion of the CourtSalinger, J.

1. Homicide: murder: specific intent to kill: non-justifiabie inference. Inez, the wife of the defendant, was discovered in a dying condition, because of statements made by defendant when more or less intoxicated, which led to an entrance into the building wherein the couple lived. The searchers went to -the basement , „ . , , ,. because of groans heard, and the woman was found lying on its floor, naked and unconscious. She died soon thereafter without having spoken intelligently, and from the effect of m,any and horrible wounds *340which, in their very nature, could not have been self-inflicted.…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Tweed v. . LiscombNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Hunter v. Colfax Consolidated Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  3. People Ex Rel. Trainor v. BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  4. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. People ex rel. Bradley v. Illinois State ReformatoryIllinois Supreme Court · 1894

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Bernard Austin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  2. Kallas v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  3. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
  4. State v. MouldenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API