Legal Opinion

Tapis International v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 24, 2000No. CV 98-11807-JLTPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

TAURO, District Judge.

At issue is the Immigration and Naturalization Service’s (“INS”) decision to deny renewal of Plaintiff Quaid Pindwara-wala’s H-1B immigration status. For the reasons discussed below, Plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment is ALLOWED.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Tapis International (“Tapis”) is an interior design firm, specializing in imported, custom designed floor coverings. As part of the Boston Design Center, it caters to designers, decorators and architects in the New England Area. For the past five years, Tapis has employed Mr. Pindwarawala as its…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Compton James Richards v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
  3. Shanti, Inc. v. RenoDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
  4. Defensor v. MeissnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  5. Louisiana Philharmonic Orchestra v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Royal Siam Corp. v. ChertoffCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  2. Caremax Inc v. HolderDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  3. Raj & Co. v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2015
  4. Residential Finance Corp. v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
  5. Chung Song Ja Corp. v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API