Legal Opinion
Raj & Co. v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided January 14, 2015No. Case No. C14-123RSMPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court pursuant to Motion for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff, Raj and Company (“Raj”) (Dkt. # 16), and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendants, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) and the United States Department of Homeland Security (Dkt. # 19). Plaintiff moves the Court to reverse USCIS’s denial of Plaintiffs petition for an H-1B “specialty occupation” visa. Neither party has requested oral argument, and the Court deems it unnecessary. Having considered…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Daryl Crane Pamela Crane v. Conoco, Inc., a Corporation, and Nunnallee-Cantwell, Inc., a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Kazarian v. US Citizenship & Immigration ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Next Generation Tech., Inc. v. JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2017
- Chung Song Ja Corp. v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2015
- Edakunni v. MayorkasDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
- Mahmood v. BitterDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
- Sagarwala v. CissnaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.