Legal Opinion

Vancouver National Bank v. Katz

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1927No. 19837. En BancPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

This action was instituted by the appellant, The Vancouver National Bank, against the defendant, John A. Lipp, and the respondents, Alma D. Katz and Otis B. Wight, to recover upon an indebtedness evidenced by three promissory notes; one for the sum of two thousand seven hundred dollars, dated August 6,1923, and due six months after its date; one for the sum of two hundred dollars, dated December 30, 1923, and due thirty days after it's date; and the third for the sum of one hundred dollars, dated January 9, 1921, and due thirty days after its date. Each of the notes was signed as maker by the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Godefroy v. HuppWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Kendall v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Ransom v. Wickstrom & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Belt v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Bright v. Hanover Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Prudential Preferred Properties v. J and J Ventures, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GillespieCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  3. Reid v. CramerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  4. Pietz v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  5. International Harvester Co. v. Bank of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API