Legal Opinion

Kendall v. Johnson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1909No. 7585PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Albertson, J., entered February 21, 1908, in favor of the defendant by direction of the court, notwithstanding the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for personal injuries sustained from a blast.

1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, C. J.

— At the times hereinafter mentioned, the defendant, C. H. Johnson, was under contract with the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company to construct from seventy-five to one hundred miles of its road lying west of the city of Ellensburg, in this state. On the 28th day of' March, 1907, Johnson entered into a subcontract with Fred Johnson & Co., a firm composed of Fred Johnson and nine’ other persons, to construct the road between certain designated stations in the vicinity of Easton, Kittitas county. On the-27th day of June, 1907, the plaintiff was employed as cook in a logging camp,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. French v. . VixNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. McCafferty v. . S.D. P.M.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Blumb v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  4. Engler v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Bright v. Hanover Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1907

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Tauscher v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Matanuska Electric Association, Inc. v. JohnsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Dayton v. FreeUtah Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Losli v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  5. North Bend Lumber Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & Puget Sound Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API